User talk:Raltseye: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 1 November 2017 by Nyargleblargle in topic Rollback warning
DatNuttyKid (talk | contribs) (→Tagging for deletion: ignore me, I've been on Discord now.) |
(→Rollback warning: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The page you recently deleted should have been discussed before deletion. It is a file redirect, which is usually discouraged, but it was created intentionally, and as it isn't vandalism, should at least have its merits considered. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 11:45, 28 June 2017 (EDT) | The page you recently deleted should have been discussed before deletion. It is a file redirect, which is usually discouraged, but it was created intentionally, and as it isn't vandalism, should at least have its merits considered. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 11:45, 28 June 2017 (EDT) | ||
== Rollback warning == | |||
You incorrectly used the rollback feature; it should be only used to undo a series of vandal edits, while the changes made by IncredibleMeh were in good faith. Please try to keep the proper use of rollback in mind in the future. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 21:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:22, 1 November 2017
Deletion
The page you recently deleted should have been discussed before deletion. It is a file redirect, which is usually discouraged, but it was created intentionally, and as it isn't vandalism, should at least have its merits considered. Nyargleblargle (talk) 11:45, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
Rollback warning
You incorrectly used the rollback feature; it should be only used to undo a series of vandal edits, while the changes made by IncredibleMeh were in good faith. Please try to keep the proper use of rollback in mind in the future. Nyargleblargle (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)