The page you recently deleted should have been discussed before deletion. It is a file redirect, which is usually discouraged, but it was created intentionally, and as it isn't vandalism, should at least have its merits considered. Nyargleblargle (talk) 11:45, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
You incorrectly used the rollback feature; it should be only used to undo a series of vandal edits, while the changes made by IncredibleMeh were in good faith. Please try to keep the proper use of rollback in mind in the future. Nyargleblargle (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Reason for revision rollback?
I've just noticed that the changes I made to the frame data table were rolled back a few days ago. While in the interest of cooperation I am willing to accept the decision to revert the changes I made, I can only reasonably do so with an explanation as to why those changes aren't appropriate. The reversion was made with no explanation as to why the changes were a problem and this behavior acts as an obstacle towards contributors being able to work with one another to the fullest.
The changes that I made to the frame data table were done so because the information was not conveyed in a way that was consistent with the developer's understanding of mechanics or to how the community perceives this information, and was not concise enough to be used in a useful manner.
- Yes, I was a little hasted when I reverted that edit. Sorry about that. I actually don't know for sure what your edit did, I just saw expression error in the table on a random page that used that template and assumed that your edit messed up the table. I realise in hindsight that it might not be the case. You are very free to revert my reversion if you see fit. Once again, I'm sorry, I should have explained in my edit summary why I did that. --Raltseye prata med mej 17:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)