User talk:Raltseye: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 2 October 2017 by DatNuttyKid in topic Tagging for deletion
(→Deletion: new section) |
DatNuttyKid (talk | contribs) (→Tagging for deletion: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The page you recently deleted should have been discussed before deletion. It is a file redirect, which is usually discouraged, but it was created intentionally, and as it isn't vandalism, should at least have its merits considered. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 11:45, 28 June 2017 (EDT) | The page you recently deleted should have been discussed before deletion. It is a file redirect, which is usually discouraged, but it was created intentionally, and as it isn't vandalism, should at least have its merits considered. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 11:45, 28 June 2017 (EDT) | ||
== Tagging for deletion == | |||
If a page is obviously spam, it's actually better ''not'' to tag it for deletion. Patrollers can delete pages that only have one edit in their history but now that you've added the tag to CelesteGarran7's user page, we have to wait for Nyargle, Prod, or Gomtuu to log on. [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]] ([[User talk:DatNuttyKid|talk]]) 14:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:03, 2 October 2017
Deletion
The page you recently deleted should have been discussed before deletion. It is a file redirect, which is usually discouraged, but it was created intentionally, and as it isn't vandalism, should at least have its merits considered. Nyargleblargle (talk) 11:45, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
Tagging for deletion
If a page is obviously spam, it's actually better not to tag it for deletion. Patrollers can delete pages that only have one edit in their history but now that you've added the tag to CelesteGarran7's user page, we have to wait for Nyargle, Prod, or Gomtuu to log on. DatNuttyKid (talk) 14:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)