1,204
edits
User talk:DatNuttyKid: Difference between revisions
From ARMS Institute, the ARMS Wiki
m
→Deletion
m (→Deletion) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:I also regret not properly addressing my thoughts with the user in question and instead just leaving it to vague and blunt edit summaries... hopefully, I didn't deter them from helping us and becoming more informed... [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]] ([[User talk:DatNuttyKid|talk]]) 00:18, 20 August 2017 (EDT) | :I also regret not properly addressing my thoughts with the user in question and instead just leaving it to vague and blunt edit summaries... hopefully, I didn't deter them from helping us and becoming more informed... [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]] ([[User talk:DatNuttyKid|talk]]) 00:18, 20 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
::Follow-up question: does the datamine belong in leaks? Or do we need more evidence of its accuracy first? Is there a place for just rumors...? [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]] ([[User talk:DatNuttyKid|talk]]) 00:19, 20 August 2017 (EDT) | ::Follow-up question: does the datamine belong in leaks? Or do we need more evidence of its accuracy first? Is there a place for just rumors...? [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]] ([[User talk:DatNuttyKid|talk]]) 00:19, 20 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
:::We're having a discussion on it at the [[ARMS Institute talk:Leaks and Rumors | :::We're having a discussion on it at the [[ARMS Institute talk:Policies/Leaks and Rumors|talk page for the rumor policy]] right now. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 16:13, 20 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
