Talk:Snake Park: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 2 November 2019 by Frosty in topic Controversy Section
(→Controversy Section: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
What do you guys think about adding a section explaining the controversy over the stage and its uncompetitive nature? Might be a nice piece of history to add. I honestly don't remember many of the details so I would need help gathering info. Any thoughts? | What do you guys think about adding a section explaining the controversy over the stage and its uncompetitive nature? Might be a nice piece of history to add. I honestly don't remember many of the details so I would need help gathering info. Any thoughts? | ||
:Did the controversy trigger any reaction from Nintendo? --[[User:Raltseye|<span style="color:#FF6464">R</span><span style="color:#11BB11">alts</span><span style="color:#6464FF">eye</span>]] [[User talk:Raltseye|prata med mej]] 01:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
::In a sense, yes. Snake Park was removed from the Ranked queue, but I'm not sure if that was a direct consequence from the controversy or not. Personally though, I think that a controversy section would be a nice addition. [[User:Frosty|Frosty]] ([[User talk:Frosty|talk]]) 16:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:43, 2 November 2019
Controversy Section
What do you guys think about adding a section explaining the controversy over the stage and its uncompetitive nature? Might be a nice piece of history to add. I honestly don't remember many of the details so I would need help gathering info. Any thoughts?
- Did the controversy trigger any reaction from Nintendo? --Raltseye prata med mej 01:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)