395
edits
Talk:Fighters: Difference between revisions
From ARMS Institute, the ARMS Wiki
→Creating Tabs for the Fighters
DatNuttyKid (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
[[User:Augrunga|Augrunga]]([[User talk:Augrunga|talk]]) | [[User:Augrunga|Augrunga]]([[User talk:Augrunga|talk]]) | ||
:I don't like that idea. The pages aren't heavy in content at the moment, and the meta isn't well-formed enough to allow analysis of specific matchups. I would like to see some more analysis of competitive viability on fighter and ARM pages, though. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 20:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | :I don't like that idea. The pages aren't heavy in content at the moment, and the meta isn't well-formed enough to allow analysis of specific matchups. I would like to see some more analysis of competitive viability on fighter and ARM pages, though. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 20:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
::I agree with Nyargle. The game isn't really popular enough (at least, not yet) for us to accurately give strategies or discuss match-ups. Furthermore, it's still being constantly updated to buff and nerf characters, so even if we did get a detailed version of these sections, we'd just have to change it shortly thereafter. We might be able to add these eventually, but I'd say probably not for a while. [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]] ([[User talk:DatNuttyKid|talk]]) 20:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
