User talk:Dragoneteur: Difference between revisions
(→Who's the real villain: new section) |
Dragoneteur (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I will not sugarcoat this: the article was completely inappropriate for the mainspace, as at this point it is entirely based on opinion. I will give you a chance you to offer an explanation for why you made the article and to demonstrate that you understand the distinction between what is and is not fitting for mainspace articles, but if this behavior is repeated again, I will be forced to temporarily block you. Thank you for your understanding of the situation, and I hope to see more constructive edits from you in the future. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 13:52, 12 July 2017 (EDT) | I will not sugarcoat this: the article was completely inappropriate for the mainspace, as at this point it is entirely based on opinion. I will give you a chance you to offer an explanation for why you made the article and to demonstrate that you understand the distinction between what is and is not fitting for mainspace articles, but if this behavior is repeated again, I will be forced to temporarily block you. Thank you for your understanding of the situation, and I hope to see more constructive edits from you in the future. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 13:52, 12 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
Sorry for this inappropriate page, it was mainly an inside joke, i promise I won't do it again. sorry again. Dragoneteur. | |||
Revision as of 17:55, 12 July 2017
Looking for something to do? You might want to...
Expand stubs (short articles) · Find something to do, or request something to be done · Join us on DiscordWhatever you do, have fun! --XenonNSMB
Who's the real villain
I will not sugarcoat this: the article was completely inappropriate for the mainspace, as at this point it is entirely based on opinion. I will give you a chance you to offer an explanation for why you made the article and to demonstrate that you understand the distinction between what is and is not fitting for mainspace articles, but if this behavior is repeated again, I will be forced to temporarily block you. Thank you for your understanding of the situation, and I hope to see more constructive edits from you in the future. Nyargleblargle (talk) 13:52, 12 July 2017 (EDT)
Sorry for this inappropriate page, it was mainly an inside joke, i promise I won't do it again. sorry again. Dragoneteur.