ARMS Institute talk:Policies/User Groups: Difference between revisions

149 bytes added , 8 August 2021

m

561

edits

Revision as of 01:22, 5 June 2017 (view source) Nyargleblargle (talk \| contribs) (→‎On the subject of approval: new section)		Latest revision as of 16:36, 8 August 2021 (view source) Prod (talk \| contribs) m (Prod moved page ARMS Institute talk:Ergjnmeisnkirböresngbpöwinrvfsnklbjsfnbwnol to ARMS Institute talk:Policies/User Groups over a redirect without leaving a redirect: revert)
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Might I propose changing the requirements to support 75% of ''active'' "higher-ups" (so as the wiki grows older and larger, we wouldn't run the risk of eventually needing perfect consensus from a bunch of admins, many of which might be inactive at the time) and the majority of other users who comment (so as not to devalue their opinions)? [[User:Nyargleblargle\|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle\|talk]]) 21:22, 4 June 2017 (EDT)		Might I propose changing the requirements to support 75% of ''active'' "higher-ups" (so as the wiki grows older and larger, we wouldn't run the risk of eventually needing perfect consensus from a bunch of admins, many of which might be inactive at the time) and the majority of other users who comment (so as not to devalue their opinions)? [[User:Nyargleblargle\|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle\|talk]]) 21:22, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

			: Sure, that's a good point. Go ahead and revise it at your discretion. [[User:Gomtuu\|Gomtuu]] ([[User talk:Gomtuu\|talk]]) 21:28, 4 June 2017 (EDT)

Anonymous