Template:Wikipedia: Difference between revisions

From ARMS Institute, the ARMS Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Tag: Reverted
m (Reverted edits by Wpvandelicer (talk) to last revision by Prod)
Tags: Replaced Rollback
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div class="noprint" style="clear: right; border: solid #aaa 1px; margin: 1em 0 1em 1em; font-size: 90%; background: #f9f9f9; width: 250px; padding: 4px; spacing: 0px; text-align: left; float: {{{float|right}}};">
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
<div style="float: left;">[[File:wikipedia-logo.png|50px|none|Wikipedia]]</div>
Search Wikipedia
<div style="margin-left: 60px;">[[wikipedia:|Wikipedia]] has more information on this subject:
Search
<div style="margin-left: 10px;">'''''[[wikipedia:{{ucfirst:{{{1|{{PAGENAME}}}}}}}|{{ucfirst:{{{2|{{{1|{{PAGENAME}}}}}}}}}}]]'''''</div>
Эскалатор метро и любитель поездов метро
</div>
You have a new Talk page message
</div>
Alert (1)
<noinclude>For articles with a Wikipedia counterpart.</noinclude>
Notices (2)
Watchlist
 
Personal tools
Main menu hide
Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
Switch to old look
Contribute
Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
Languages
Language links are at the top of the page across from the title.
View source for IAU definition of planet
 
Article
Talk
Read
Edit source
View history
Watch
 
TW
Tools hide
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Wikidata item
← IAU definition of planet
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
 
This account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
The account ‪Эскалатор метро и любитель поездов метро‬ has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Materialscientist‬ for the following reason(s):
 
Vandalism
 
This block will not expire.
 
Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.
 
For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.
 
Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
 
You can view and copy the source of your edits to this page.
 
[[File:Ny pendeltag stockholm.jpg|frameless|1250px|не удаляйте это фото или я загружу его снова]]
[[image:Solna centrum, 20230407, tunnelbanan, bild 4.jpg|500px|alt=m3tro]]
[[file:Näckrosen, t-bana, 20230408, 06.jpg|thumb|500px|left]]
[[file:Östermalmstorg, 20230423, bild 4.jpg|thumb|500px|center]]
[[file:C30, Östermalmstorg, 20230226.jpg|thumb|500px|left]]
[[file:C20, Östermalmstorg, 20230226.jpg|thumb|500px]]
[[file:C20, Kungsträdgården, 2022023.jpg|thumb|500px|center]]
[[file:CX-vagn, tunnelbana, 20220129 - bild 3.jpg|thumb|500px|left]]
[[file:Dörrar på CX, Kundsträdgården, interiör, 20220930, bild 2.jpg|thumb|500px|center]]
[[file:T11 T-bana Metro subway at Akalla station in Stockholm Sweden.png|thumb|500px|left]]
[[file:Akalla metro 20180624 24.jpg|thumb|500px]]
[[file:Demonstrationståg Hjulsta.jpg|thumb|500px|center]]
[[file:Hjulsta metro 20170902 12.jpg|thumb|500px|left]]
[[file:skarpnäck metro 20190420 12.jpg|thumb|500px]]
[[file:Skarpnäck metro 20190420 01.jpg|thumb|500px|center]]
[[file:Rulltrappa, T-centralen, 20230312, 11.jpg|thumb|500px|left]]
[[file:Escalators at Stadtshagen.jpg|thumb|500px]]
[[file:Stockholm - Tunnelbana - Gärdet (11092721586).jpg|thumb|500px|center]]
[[file:Stockholm - Tunnelbana - Fridhemsplan (10914897684).jpg|thumb|500px|left]]
[[file:Danderyds Sjukhus T-bana 009.jpg|thumb|500px]]
[[file:Dörrar på X60B - 1.JPG|thumb|center|500px]]
[[file:Gång på X60B - 2.JPG|thumb|left|500px]]
[[file:Interiör, SL X60, 20221105, bild 4.jpg|thumb|500px]]
[[file:Railway bridge and Alstom X60 in Stockholm, 2016.jpg|thumb|center|500px]]
[[file:SL X60, stockholm city, 20230312, 05.jpg|thumb|left|500px]]
 
 
{{short description|Formal definition of a planet in the context of the Solar System as ratified by the IAU in 2006}}
{{About|the formal definition established in 2006||Definition of planet}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:IAU definition of <em>planet</em>}}
[[File:Euler-Diagram bodies in the Solar System.jpg|thumb|350x350px|[[Euler diagram]] showing the IAU Executive Committee conception of the types of bodies in the Solar System.]]
The [[International Astronomical Union]] (IAU) defined in August 2006 that, in the [[Solar System]],<ref>[[Exoplanet]]s are addressed in a 2003 position statement issued by a now-defunct IAU Working Group on Extrasolar Planets. However, this position statement was never proposed as an official IAU resolution and was never voted on by IAU members.</ref> a ''[[planet]]'' is a [[celestial body]] that:
# is in [[orbit]] around the [[Sun]],
# has sufficient mass to assume [[hydrostatic equilibrium]] (a nearly round shape), and
# has "[[Clearing the neighbourhood|cleared the neighbourhood]]" around its orbit.
 
A non-[[Natural satellite|satellite]] body fulfilling only the first two of these criteria (such as [[Pluto]], which had hitherto been considered a planet) is classified as a ''[[dwarf planet]]''. According to the IAU, "planets and dwarf planets are two distinct classes of objects" – in other words, "dwarf planets" are not planets. A non-satellite body fulfilling only the first criterion is termed a ''[[small Solar System body]]'' (SSSB).  An alternate proposal included dwarf planets as a subcategory of planets, but IAU members voted against this proposal. The decision was a controversial one, and has drawn both support and criticism from [[astronomers]].
 
The IAU has stated that there are [[Planet#Solar System|eight known planets]] in the Solar System. It has been argued that the definition is problematic because it depends on the location of the body: if a [[Mars]]-sized body were discovered in the [[inner Oort cloud]], it would not have enough mass to clear out a neighbourhood that size and meet criterion 3.<ref name=plutoplanet/>
 
The definition distinguishes planets from smaller bodies and is not applicable outside the Solar System. There is no accepted definition of [[Exoplanet|extrasolar planet]]s, or exoplanets. In 2007, an IAU working group issued a position statement that proposes to distinguish exoplanets from [[brown dwarf]]s on the basis of mass,<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1017/S1743921306004509|bibcode=2007IAUTA..26..183B|title=Working Group on Extrasolar Planets|journal=Transactions of the International Astronomical Union|volume=26A|pages=183–186|last1=Boss|first1=Alan P.|last2=Butler|first2=R. Paul|last3=Hubbard|first3=William B.|last4=Ianna|first4=Philip A.|last5=Kürster|first5=Martin|last6=Lissauer|first6=Jack J.|last7=Mayor|first7=Michel|last8=Meech|first8=Karen J.|last9=Mignard|first9=Francois|last10=Penny|first10=Alan J.|last11=Quirrenbach|first11=Andreas|last12=Tarter|first12=Jill C.|last13=Vidal-Madjar|first13=Alfred|year=2007|doi-access=free}}</ref> but there has been no IAU-wide resolution or vote associated with this position statement. A separate proposal to extend the IAU definition to exoplanets<ref name="Margot 2015">{{cite journal| title= A Quantitative Criterion for Defining Planets| first=Jean-Luc| last=Margot| date=2015-10-15| doi= 10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/185| journal= The Astronomical Journal| volume=150| issue=6| pages=185| arxiv=1507.06300 | bibcode=2015AJ....150..185M| s2cid=51684830}}</ref> has not been formally reviewed by the IAU.
 
==Background==
[[File:Outersolarsystem objectpositions labels comp.png|thumb|400 px|Plot of the positions of all known [[Kuiper belt object]]s (green), set against the outer planets (blue)]]
 
The process of new discoveries spurring a contentious refinement of Pluto's categorization echoed a debate in the 19th century that began with the discovery of [[Ceres (dwarf planet)|Ceres]] on January 1, 1801.<ref name=plutoplanet/> Astronomers immediately declared the tiny object to be the "missing planet" between Mars and Jupiter. Within four years, however, the discovery of two more objects with comparable sizes and orbits had cast doubt on this new thinking. By 1851, the number of planets had grown to 23 (the eight major planets, plus fifteen minor planets between Mars and Jupiter), and it was clear that hundreds more would eventually be discovered. Astronomers began cataloguing them separately and began calling them "asteroids" instead of "planets".<ref>{{cite journal| author=Soter, Steven| title=What Is a Planet?| journal=Scientific American| date=2007| volume=296| issue=1| pages=34–41| url=http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colID=1&articleID=93385350-E7F2-99DF-3FD6272BB4959038| doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0107-34| pmid=17186831| bibcode=2007SciAm.296a..34S| arxiv=astro-ph/0608359| access-date=2007-01-11| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071013165225/http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colID=1&articleID=93385350-E7F2-99DF-3FD6272BB4959038| archive-date=2007-10-13| url-status=dead}}</ref> With the discovery of [[Pluto]] by [[Clyde Tombaugh]] in 1930, astronomers considered the [[Solar System]] to have nine [[planet]]s, along with thousands of smaller bodies such as [[asteroids]] and [[comets]]. Pluto was initially thought to be larger than [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]].
 
Tombaugh discovered Pluto while working at the [[Lowell Observatory]] founded by [[Percival Lowell]], one of many astronomers who had theorized on the existence of the large [[trans-Neptunian object]] [[Planet X]], and Tombaugh had been searching for Planet X when he found Pluto. Almost immediately after its discovery, however, astronomers questioned whether Pluto could be Planet X. [[Willy Ley]] wrote a column in 1956 titled "The Demotion of Pluto", stating that it "simply failed to live up to the advance publicity it received as 'Planet X' before its discovery. It has been a disappointment all along, for it did not turn out to be what one could reasonably have expected".<ref name="ley195608">{{Cite magazine
|last=Ley
|first=Willy
|date=August 1956
|title=The Demotion of Pluto
|department=For Your Information
|url=https://archive.org/stream/galaxymagazine-1956-08#page/n79/mode/2up
|magazine=Galaxy Science Fiction
|pages=79–91
}}</ref>
 
In 1978, Pluto's moon [[Charon (moon)|Charon]] was discovered. By measuring Charon's orbital period, astronomers could accurately calculate Pluto's mass for the first time, which they found to be much smaller than expected.<ref>{{Cite journal |arxiv = astro-ph/0512491|doi = 10.1086/504422|title = Orbits and Photometry of Pluto's Satellites: Charon, S/2005 P1, and S/2005 P2|journal = The Astronomical Journal|volume = 132|pages = 290–298|year = 2006|last1 = Buie|first1 = Marc W.|last2 = Grundy|first2 = William M.|last3 = Young|first3 = Eliot F.|last4 = Young|first4 = Leslie A.|last5 = Stern|first5 = S. Alan|issue = 1|bibcode = 2006AJ....132..290B|s2cid = 119386667}}</ref> Pluto's mass was roughly one twenty-fifth of Mercury's, making it by far the smallest planet, smaller even than the Earth's [[Moon]], although it was still over ten times as massive as the largest asteroid, [[Ceres (dwarf planet)|Ceres]].
 
In the 1990s, astronomers began finding other objects at least as far away as Pluto, known as [[Kuiper Belt object]]s, or KBOs.<ref>[http://www.plutopetition.com/unplanet.php Much Ado about Pluto] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080125225956/http://www.plutopetition.com/unplanet.php |date=2008-01-25 }} plutopetition.com</ref> Many of these shared some of Pluto's key orbital characteristics and are consequently called [[plutinos]]. Pluto came to be seen as the largest member of a new class of objects, and some astronomers stopped referring to Pluto as a planet.<ref name=plutoplanet>{{cite journal| title=Planetesimals to Brown Dwarfs: What is a Planet?| author = Gibor Basri| author2 = Michael E. Brown | access-date=2008-08-04| url=http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/papers/ps/basribrown.pdf| bibcode=2006AREPS..34..193B| volume=34| date=2006| pages=193–216| journal=Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences| doi=10.1146/annurev.earth.34.031405.125058|arxiv = astro-ph/0608417 | s2cid = 119338327}}</ref> Pluto's eccentric and inclined orbit, while very unusual for a planet in the Solar System, fits in well with the other KBOs. New York City's newly renovated [[Hayden Planetarium]] did not include Pluto in its exhibit of the planets when it reopened as the [[Rose Center for Earth and Space]] in 2000.<ref>[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/050215_pluto_anniv.html Pluto at 75: Still Crazy After All These Years] Space.com</ref>
 
Starting in 2000, with the discovery of at least three bodies ([[50000 Quaoar|Quaoar]], [[90377 Sedna|Sedna]], and [[Eris (dwarf planet)|Eris]]) all comparable to Pluto in terms of size and [[orbit]], it became clear that either they all had to be called planets or Pluto would have to be reclassified. Astronomers also thought it likely that more objects as large as Pluto would be discovered, and the number of planets would start growing quickly. They were also concerned about the [[classification of planets]] in other [[planetary system]]s. In 2006, the first measurement of the volume of Eris erroneously (until the ''[[New Horizons]]'' mission to Pluto) showed it to be slightly larger than Pluto, and so was thought to be equally deserving of the status of "planet".<ref name=plutoplanet/>
 
Because new planets are discovered infrequently, the IAU did not have any mechanism for their definition and naming.  After the discovery of [[90377 Sedna|Sedna]], it set up a 19-member committee in 2005, with the British astronomer [[Iwan Williams]] in the chair, to consider the definition of a planet.  It proposed three definitions that could be adopted:
;Cultural: a planet is a planet if enough people say it is;
;Structural: a planet is large enough to form a sphere;
;Dynamical: the object is large enough to cause all other objects to eventually leave its orbit.<ref>Stephen Eales, ''Prospect'', p.p.31-34 (May 2007)</ref>
Another committee, chaired by a historian of astronomy, [[Owen Gingerich]], a historian and astronomer emeritus at [[Harvard University]] who led the committee which generated the original definition, and consisting of five planetary scientists and the science writer [[Dava Sobel]], was set up to make a firm proposal.<ref>Eales, ''op. cit.''</ref>
 
==Proposals==
=== First draft proposal ===
[[File:ThePlanetDefinition.svg|thumb|upright=1.5|Illustration of the draft proposal]]
[[File:Three proposed planets postNHprobe.jpg|thumb|The original proposal would have immediately added three planets, shown here in a size comparison to Earth. Leftmost is Pluto (shown in lieu of Eris, which is about the same size), then Charon, Ceres, and Earth]]
 
The IAU published the ''original'' definition proposal on August 16, 2006.<ref name=original>{{cite press release| url=http://www.iau.org/news/pressreleases/detail/iau0601/|title=The IAU draft definition of "planet" and "plutons"| publisher=International Astronomical Union |date=2006-08-16|access-date=2008-08-16}}</ref> Its form followed loosely the second of three options proposed by the original committee. It stated that:<ref name=original/>
{{quote|A planet is a celestial body that (a) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a [[hydrostatic equilibrium]] (nearly round) shape, and (b) is in orbit around a star, and is neither a star nor a satellite of a planet.}}
 
This definition would have led to three more celestial bodies being recognized as planets, in addition to the previously accepted nine:
* [[Ceres (dwarf planet)|Ceres]], which had been considered a planet at the time of its discovery, but was subsequently treated as an asteroid
* [[Charon (moon)|Charon]], a moon of Pluto; the Pluto-Charon system would have been considered a [[double planet]]
* [[Eris (dwarf planet)|Eris]], a body in the [[scattered disk]] of the outer Solar System
 
A further twelve bodies, pending refinements of knowledge regarding their physical properties, were possible candidates to join the list under this definition. Some objects in this second list were more likely eventually to be adopted as 'planets' than others. Despite what had been claimed in the media,<ref name="boston.com">{{cite news | title=Nine no longer: Panel declares 12 planets|author=Gareth Cook| work=Boston Globe|url=http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2006/08/16/nine_no_longer_panel_declares_12_planets/ | access-date=2006-08-16 | date=2006-08-16}}</ref> the proposal did not necessarily leave the Solar System with only twelve planets. [[Michael E. Brown|Mike Brown]], the discoverer of [[90377 Sedna|Sedna]] and Eris, has said that at least 53 known bodies in the Solar System probably fit the definition, and that a complete survey would probably reveal more than 200.<ref name="Brown 2006">{{cite web |date=2006 |title=How Many Planets Are There? |first=Mike |last=Brown |website=Caltech |url=http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/whatsaplanet/howmanplanets.html |access-date=2006-08-16 }}</ref>
 
The definition would have considered a pair of objects to be a [[double planet]] system if each component independently satisfied the planetary criteria and the common [[center of gravity]] of the system (known as the ''[[Barycentric coordinates (astronomy)|barycenter]]'') was located outside of both bodies.<ref name="Space Aug 16">{{cite web | date=2006 | title=Nine Planets Become 12 with Controversial New Definition |author=Robert Roy Britt| work=Space.com|url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060816_planet_definition.html| access-date=2006-08-16}}</ref> [[Pluto]] and Charon would have been the only known double planet in the Solar System. Other planetary satellites (such as the [[Moon]] or [[Ganymede (moon)|Ganymede]]) might be in [[hydrostatic equilibrium]], but would still not have been defined as a component of a double planet, since the barycenter of the system lies within the more massive celestial body.
 
[[File:0planet-candidates.jpg|thumb|left|The twelve "candidate planets" that were possibilities for inclusion under the originally proposed definition. Note that all but the last three are trans-Neptunian objects. The smallest three (Vesta, Pallas, Hygeia) are in the asteroid belt.]]
 
The term "minor planet" would have been abandoned, replaced by the categories "[[small Solar System body]]" (SSSB) and a new classification of "pluton". The former would have described those objects underneath the "spherical" threshold. The latter would have been applied to those planets with highly inclined orbits, large eccentricities and an orbital period of more than 200 earth years (that is, those orbiting beyond Neptune). Pluto would have been the prototype for this class. The term "[[dwarf planet]]" would have been available to describe all planets smaller than the eight "classical planets" in orbit around the Sun, though would not have been an official IAU classification.<ref name="iau0601_resolution">{{cite web | date=2006 | title=Draft Resolution 5 for GA-XXVI: Definition of a Planet| work=International Astronomical Union|url=http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_resolution.html
| access-date=2006-08-16 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060822191830/http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_resolution.html |archive-date = August 22, 2006}}</ref> The IAU did not make recommendations in the draft resolution on what separated a planet from a [[brown dwarf]].<ref>{{cite web | date=2006 | title=Planet Definition" Questions & Answers Sheet| work=International Astronomical Union|url=http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_Q_A.html
| access-date=2006-08-16 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060822192043/http://www.iau2006.org/mirror/www.iau.org/iau0601/iau0601_Q_A.html |archive-date = August 22, 2006}}</ref> A vote on the proposal was scheduled for August 24, 2006.<ref name="boston.com"/>
 
Such a definition of the term "planet" could also have led to changes in classification for the [[trans-Neptunian object]]s {{dp|Haumea}}, {{dp|Makemake}}, [[90377 Sedna|Sedna]], [[90482 Orcus|Orcus]], [[50000 Quaoar|Quaoar]], [[20000 Varuna|Varuna]], {{mpl-|55636|2002 TX|300}}, [[28978 Ixion|Ixion]], and {{mpl-|55565|2002 AW|197}}, and the asteroids [[4 Vesta|Vesta]], [[2 Pallas|Pallas]], and [[10 Hygiea|Hygiea]].
 
On 18 August the Committee of the Division of Planetary Sciences (DPS) of the [[American Astronomical Society]] endorsed the draft proposal.<ref>{{cite web | date=2006 | url=http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Planetary_Scientists_Support_Proposed_Redefinition_Of_A_Planet_999.html | title=Planetary Scientists Support Proposed Redefinition Of A Planet
|work=SpaceDaily | access-date=2006-08-19}}</ref> The DPS Committee represents a small subset of the DPS members, and no resolution in support of the IAU definition was considered or approved by the DPS membership.
 
According to an IAU draft resolution, the roundness condition generally results in the need for a mass of at least 5{{e|20}} kg, or diameter of at least 800&nbsp;km.<ref name="iau0601_resolution"/><!---{{better source|Source given is draft resolution, which was NOT adopted by the IAU|date=August 2012}}---> However, [[Michael E. Brown|Mike Brown]] claimed that these numbers are only right for rocky bodies like asteroids, and that icy bodies like [[Kuiper Belt]] objects reach hydrostatic equilibrium at much smaller sizes, probably somewhere between 200 and 400&nbsp;km in diameter.<ref name="Brown 2006" /> It all depends on the rigidity of the material that makes up the body, which is in turn strongly influenced by its internal temperature. Assuming that [[Methone (moon)|Methone's]] shape reflects the balance between the [[tidal force]] exerted by Saturn and the moon's gravity, its tiny 3&nbsp;km diameter suggests Methone is composed of icy fluff.<ref>{{cite conference
| first1 = P. C.  | last1 = Thomas
| last2 = Burns | first2 = J. A.
| last3 = Tiscareno | first3 = M. S.
| last4 = Hedman | first4 = M. M.
| last5 = Helfenstein | first5 = P.
| title = Saturn's Mysterious Arc-Embedded Moons: Recycled Fluff?
| book-title = 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference
| pages = 1598 | date = 2013
| url = http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2013/pdf/1598.pdf
| access-date = 2013-05-21
| ref = {{sfnRef|Thomas|2013}}
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
| last = Battersby | first = S.
| title = Saturn's egg moon Methone is made of fluff
| work = [[New Scientist]]
| date = 2013-05-17
| url = https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23560-astrophile-saturns-egg-moon-methone-is-made-of-fluff.html
| access-date = 2013-05-21
| ref = {{sfnRef|Battersby, 2013}}
}}</ref> The IAU's stated radius and mass limit are not too far off from what as of 2019 is believed to be the approximate limit for objects beyond Neptune that are fully compact, solid bodies, with {{dp|Salacia}} (''r'' = {{val|423|11|u=km}}, ''m'' = {{val|0.492|0.007|e=21|u=km}}) and possibly {{mpl-|307261|2002 MS|4}} (''r'' = {{val|400|12|u=km}}, ''m'' unknown) being borderline cases both for the 2006 Q&A expectations and in more recent evaluations, and with {{dp|Orcus}} being just above the expected limit.<ref name=Grundy2019>{{cite journal
|first1=W.M. |last1=Grundy
|first2=K.S. |last2=Noll
|first3=M.W. |last3=Buie
|first4=S.D. |last4=Benecchi
|first5=D. |last5=Ragozzine
|first6=H.G. |last6=Roe
|title=The Mutual Orbit, Mass, and Density of Transneptunian Binary Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà ({{mp|(229762) 2007 UK|126}})
|url=http://www2.lowell.edu/users/grundy/abstracts/2019.G-G.html
|journal=Icarus
|doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.037
|year= 2019
|volume=334
|pages=30–38
|s2cid=126574999
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190407045339/http://www2.lowell.edu/~grundy/abstracts/preprints/2019.G-G.pdf
|url-status=live
|archive-date=7 April 2019}}</ref>
 
==== Advantages ====
The proposed definition found support among many astronomers as it used the presence of a physical qualitative factor (the object being round) as its defining feature. Most other potential definitions depended on a limiting quantity (e.g., a minimum size or maximum [[orbital inclination]]) tailored for the Solar System. According to members of the IAU committee this definition did not use human-made limits but instead deferred to "nature" in deciding whether or not an object was a planet.<ref>{{cite web | date=2006 | url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060816_planet_definition.html | title=Nine Planets Become 12 with Controversial New Definition | author=Robert Roy Britt
| work=Space.com | access-date=2006-08-19}}</ref>
 
It also had the advantage of measuring an observable quality. Suggested criteria involving the nature of formation would have been more likely to see accepted planets later declassified as scientific understanding improved.{{cn|date=August 2021}}
 
Additionally, the definition kept Pluto as a planet. Pluto's planetary status was and is fondly thought of by many, especially in the United States since Pluto was found by American astronomer [[Clyde Tombaugh]], and the general public could have been alienated from professional astronomers; there was considerable uproar when the media last suggested, in 1999, that Pluto might be demoted, which was a misunderstanding of a proposal to catalog all [[trans-Neptunian object]]s uniformly.<ref>{{cite web | date=2006 | url=http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0776605.html | title=The Flap over Pluto | author = Pearson education | work=infoplease.com | access-date=2006-08-19}}</ref>
 
==== Criticism ====
The proposed definition was criticised as ambiguous: Astronomer [[Phil Plait]] and [[National Center for Science Education|NCSE]] writer [[Nick Matzke]] both wrote about why they thought the definition was not, in general, a good one.<ref>{{cite web | date=2006 | url=http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/08/15/congratulations-its-a-planet/ | title=Congratulations! It's a planet! | author=Phil Plait | author-link=Phil Plait | work=Bad Astronomy | access-date=2006-08-18 | archive-date=2011-10-03 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111003163509/http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/08/15/congratulations-its-a-planet/ | url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | date=2006 | url=http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/08/wherein_i_argue.html | title=Wherein I argue emotionally about the definition of "planet" | author=Nick Matzke | author-link=Nick Matzke | work=[[The Panda's Thumb (blog)|The Panda's Thumb]] | access-date=2006-08-18 | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060908092735/http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/08/wherein_i_argue.html | archive-date=2006-09-08 }}</ref> It defined a planet as orbiting a star, which would have meant that any planet ejected from its star system or formed outside of one (a [[rogue planet]]) could not have been called a planet, even if it fit all other criteria.  However, a similar situation already applies to the term 'moon'—such bodies ceasing to be moons on being ejected from planetary orbit—and this usage has widespread acceptance.  Another criticism was that the definition did not differentiate between planets and [[brown dwarf]] stars. Any attempt to clarify this differentiation was to be left until a later date.
 
There had also been criticism of the proposed definition of [[double planet]]: at present the Moon is defined as a satellite of the Earth, but over time the Earth-Moon [[barycenter]] will drift outwards (see [[tidal acceleration]]) and could eventually become situated outside of both bodies.<ref name="Space 18 March 2003">{{cite web | date=2006 | title=Moon Mechanics: What Really Makes Our World Go 'Round  |author=Robert Roy Britt| work=Space.com|url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/moon_mechanics_0303018.html| access-date=2010-08-24| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100822072302/http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/moon_mechanics_0303018.html <!--Added by H3llBot-->| archive-date=2010-08-22}}</ref> This development would then upgrade the Moon to planetary status at that time, according to the definition. The time taken for this to occur, however, would be billions of years, long after many astronomers expect the Sun to expand into a [[red giant]] and destroy both Earth and Moon.<ref>{{cite news| date=2006 | author=Robert Roy Britt| title= Earth's moon could become a planet| url=http://edition.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/08/18/moon.planet/ | work=CNN}}</ref>
 
In an 18 August 2006 ''[[Science Friday]]'' interview, Mike Brown expressed doubt that a scientific definition was even necessary. He stated, "The analogy that I always like to use is the word "[[continent]]". You know, the word "continent" has no scientific definition ... they're just cultural definitions, and I think the geologists are wise to leave that one alone and not try to redefine things so that the word "continent" has a big, strict definition."<ref>{{cite web |author=[[Ira Flatow]] and [[Michael E. Brown|Mike Brown]] |title=Pluto's Planet Status / String Theory |date=2006-08-18 |work=[[Science Friday]] |publisher=[[National Public Radio]] |url=http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/2006/Aug/hour2_081806.html |access-date=2006-08-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060830102430/http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/2006/Aug/hour2_081806.html |archive-date=2006-08-30 }}</ref>
 
On 18 August, [[Owen Gingerich]] said that correspondence he had received had been evenly divided for and against the proposal.<ref name="Britt 2006">{{cite web| first=Robert Roy| last= Britt| url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060818_planet_newprop.html| title=Pluto May Get Demoted After All| publisher=Space.com| date=2006-08-18| access-date=2006-08-24}}</ref>
 
=== Alternative proposal ===
According to [[Alan Boss]] of the [[Carnegie Institution of Washington]], a subgroup of the IAU met on August 18, 2006 and held a [[straw poll]] on the draft proposal: only 18 were in favour of it, with over 50 against. The 50 in opposition preferred an alternative proposal drawn up by [[Uruguay]]an astronomers [[Gonzalo Tancredi]] and [[Julio Ángel Fernández]].<ref name="Britt 2006"/>
 
{{cquote|(1) A planet is a celestial body that (a) is by far the largest object in its local population[1], (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a [[hydrostatic equilibrium]] (nearly round) shape [2], (c) does not produce energy by any [[nuclear fusion]] mechanism [3].
 
(2) According to point (1) the eight classical planets discovered before 1900, which move in nearly circular orbits close to the ecliptic plane are the only planets of the Solar System. All the other objects in orbit around the Sun are smaller than Mercury. We recognize that there are objects that fulfill the criteria (b) and (c) but not criterion (a). Those objects are defined as "dwarf" planets. Ceres as well as Pluto and several other large Trans-Neptunian objects belong to this category. In contrast to the planets, these objects typically have highly inclined orbits and/or large eccentricities.
 
(3) All the other natural objects orbiting the Sun that do not fulfill any of the previous criteria shall be referred to collectively as "[[Small Solar System Bodies]]".[4]
 
; Definitions and clarifications:
 
# The local population is the collection of objects that cross or closely approach the orbit of the body in consideration.
# This generally applies to objects with sizes above several hundred kilometers, depending on the material strength.
# This criterion allows the distinction between gas giant planets and brown dwarfs or stars.
# This class currently includes most of the Solar System asteroids, [[Near-Earth object]]s (NEOs), Mars-, Jupiter- and Neptune-Trojan asteroids, most [[Centaur (planetoid)|Centaurs]], most [[Trans-Neptunian Objects]] (TNOs), and comets.<ref>{{cite web| date=2006 | title= Details Emerge on Plan to Demote Pluto | website= [[Space.com]] | access-date= 2006-08-18 | url= http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060819_new_proposal.html }}</ref>}}
 
Under this proposal, Pluto would have been demoted to a [[dwarf planet]].
 
=== Revised draft proposal ===
On 22 August 2006 the draft proposal was rewritten with two changes from the previous draft.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://kuffner-sternwarte.at/im_brennp/archiv2006/Planeten_Definition_Resolution_5_6_7.html |title = The IAU Committee Presents Today in Prague the new Proposals for the Definition of Planet | author=Günther Wuchterl |date=2006-08-22  |access-date= 2008-08-04}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://kuffner-sternwarte.at/im_brennp/archiv2006/Planeten_Definition_Resolution_c.html|title=The IAU's Definition of Planet develops further – Draft c |date=2006-08-23|author=Günther Wuchterl |access-date=2008-08-04}}</ref> The first was a generalisation of the name of the new class of planets (previously the draft resolution had explicitly opted for the term ''pluton''), with a decision on the name to be used postponed.  Many geologists had been critical of the choice of name for Pluto-like planets,<ref>{{cite web| date=2006 | title=Star-gazers puzzled by Pluto | access-date= 2006-08-18 | work= Independent Online | url= http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=31&art_id=qw1155925441701B222 }}</ref> being concerned about the term ''[[pluton]]'', which has been used for years within the geological community to represent a form of magmatic [[intrusion]]; such formations are fairly common balls of rock.<ref>{{cite web | date= 2006 | title= Geologists Force Astronomers To Rethink Pluto Plan | access-date= 2006-08-18 | url= http://www.playfuls.com/news_001938_Geologists_Force_Astronomers_To_Rethink_Pluto_Plan.html | url-status= dead | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070517055803/http://www.playfuls.com/news_001938_Geologists_Force_Astronomers_To_Rethink_Pluto_Plan.html | archive-date= 2007-05-17 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | date= 2006 | title= Planet, pluton or rock? | access-date= 2006-08-20 | url= http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/news/ci_4210195 | author= Elise Kleeman | work= Pasadena Star News | url-status= dead | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070928094000/http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/news/ci_4210195 | archive-date= 2007-09-28 }}</ref> Confusion was thought undesirable due to the status of planetology as a field closely allied to geology.<ref>{{cite journal| url=http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060821/full/060821-4.html | title= Plutons, planets and dwarves : Geologists and astronomers wrangle over words | journal= Nature News | author= Geoff Brumfiel | date= 2006-08-21| doi= 10.1038/news060821-4 | s2cid= 128414918 }}</ref> Further concerns surrounded use of the word ''pluton'' as in major languages such as [[French language|French]] and [[Spanish language|Spanish]], Pluto is itself called ''Pluton'', potentially adding to confusion.{{cn|date=August 2021}}
 
The second change was a redrawing of the planetary definition in the case of a double planet system.  There had been a concern that, in extreme cases where a double body had its secondary component in a highly eccentric orbit, there could have been a drift of the barycenter in and out of the primary body, leading to a shift in the classification of the secondary body between [[satellite]] and planet depending on where the system was in its orbit.<ref>{{cite web | access-date = 2008-08-04 | title = Congratulations! It's a planet! | author = Phil Plait | date = 2006-08-15 | format = blog | url = http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/08/15/congratulations-its-a-planet/ | archive-date = 2011-10-03 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111003163509/http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/08/15/congratulations-its-a-planet/ | url-status = dead }}</ref> Thus the definition was reformulated so as to consider a double planet system in existence if its barycenter lay outside both bodies for a majority of the system's orbital period.{{cn|date=August 2021}}
 
Later on August 22, two open meetings were held which ended in an abrupt about-face on the basic planetary definition. The position of astronomer [[Julio Ángel Fernández]] gained the upper hand among the members attending and was described as unlikely to lose its hold by August 24. This position would result in only eight major planets, with Pluto ranking as a "dwarf planet".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/22/science/space/22cnd-pluto.html |title=Pluto Seems Poised to Lose Its Planet Status|date=2006-08-22|work=New York Times|first=Dennis|last=Overbye}}</ref> The discussion at the first meeting was heated and lively, with IAU members in vocal disagreement with one another over such issues as the relative merits of [[statics|static]] and [[Dynamics (mechanics)|dynamic]] physics; the main sticking point was whether or not to include a body's orbital characteristics among the definition criteria.  In an indicative vote, members heavily defeated the proposals on Pluto-like objects and double planet systems, and were evenly divided on the question of hydrostatic equilibrium.  The debate was said to be "still open", with private meetings being held ahead of a vote scheduled for the following day.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://science.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1193282.php/Astronomers_divided_over_planet_definition|title=Astronomers divided over 'planet' definition|date=2006-08-22|publisher=Deutsche Presse-Agentur|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060830191831/http://science.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1193282.php/Astronomers_divided_over_planet_definition|archive-date=2006-08-30}}</ref>
 
At the second meeting of the day, following "secret" negotiations, a compromise began to emerge after the Executive Committee moved explicitly to exclude consideration of [[extra-solar planets]] and to bring into the definition a criterion concerning the dominance of a body in its neighbourhood.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://skytonight.com/news/home/3707031.html|title=The Day We Lost Pluto|date=2006-08-22|publisher=Sky & Telescope|first=Richard|last=Tresch Fienberg|access-date=2006-08-23|archive-date=2009-01-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090107053339/http://skytonight.com/news/home/3707031.html|url-status=dead}}</ref>
 
=== Final draft proposal ===
The final, third draft definition proposed on 24 August 2006 read:
 
{{cquote|The IAU...resolves that planets and other bodies in the Solar System be defined into three distinct categories in the following way:
(1) A planet [1] is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
 
(2) A "dwarf planet" is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape [2], (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.
 
(3) All other objects [3] orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as "Small Solar System Bodies".
 
[1] The eight planets are: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.
 
[2] An IAU process will be established to assign borderline objects into either dwarf planet and other categories.
 
[3] These currently include most of the Solar System asteroids, most Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), comets, and other small bodies.}}
 
[[File:The Planets Definition 2.svg|thumb|500px|right|Illustration of the final proposal]]
 
<!-- What exactly it meant to say that a body had "[[[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki/cleared%20the%20neighbourhood cleared the neighbourhood]]] around its orbit" or that it had a "nearly round" shape was explicitly not defined. These descriptions were used partly to allow for some "[[[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki/common%20sense common sense]]]" judgement, but primarily to provide language that could readily be used in communicating the definitions to lay audiences.{{Fact|date=August 2008}} -->
 
==== Plenary session debate ====
Voting on the definition took place at the Assembly plenary session during the afternoon.  Following a reversion to the previous rules on 15 August, as a planetary definition is a primarily scientific matter, every individual member of the Union attending the Assembly was eligible to vote. The plenary session was chaired by astronomer [[Jocelyn Bell Burnell]].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Hogan|first1=Jenny|title=Diary of a planet's demise|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/442966a|publisher=Nature|date=2008-08-24}}</ref> During this session, IAU members cast votes on each resolution by raising yellow cards. A team of students counted the votes in each section of the auditorium, and astronomer [[Virginia Trimble]] compiled and tallied the vote counts.<ref>{{cite news|title=Pluto in perspective|url=https://www.ocregister.com/2006/09/01/pluto-in-perspective/|publisher=Orange County Register|date=2006-09-01}}</ref>
 
[[File:IAU-GA-2006-Pluto-Vote.jpg|thumb|Plenary session of the IAU General Assembly on August 24, 2006. Votes were cast by raising yellow cards.]]
 
The IAU Executive Committee presented four Resolutions to the Assembly, each concerning a different aspect of the debate over the definition.<ref name="nsiii_09">[http://astro.cas.cz/nuncius/nsiii_09.pdf IAU General Assembly Newspaper, 24 August 2006]</ref> Minor amendments were made on the floor for the purposes of clarification.
 
* ''Resolution 5A'' constituted the definition itself as stated above.  There was much discussion among members about the appropriateness of using the expression "cleared the neighbourhood" instead of the earlier reference to "dominant body", and about the implications of the definition for [[satellites]].  The Resolution was ultimately approved by a near-unanimous vote.
* ''Resolution 5B'' sought to amend the above definition by the insertion of the word ''classical'' before the word ''planet'' in paragraph (1) and footnote [1].  This represented a choice between having a set of three distinct categories of body (planet, "dwarf planet" and SSSB) and the opening of an umbrella of 'planets' over the first two such categories.  The Resolution proposed the latter option; it was defeated convincingly, with only 91<ref name=IAU0603/> members voting in its favour.
* ''Resolution 6A'' proposed a statement concerning Pluto: "Pluto is a dwarf planet by the above definition and is recognized as the prototype of a new category of trans-Neptunian objects."  After a little quibbling over the grammar involved and questions of exactly what constituted a "trans-Neptunian object",{{citation needed|date=April 2017}} the Resolution was approved by a vote of 237–157, with 30 abstentions.<ref name="nsiii_10">{{cite web|url=http://astro.cas.cz/nuncius/nsiii_10.pdf|title=IAU General Assembly Newspaper, 25 August 2006|work=IAU|access-date=2014-07-03}}</ref> A new category of dwarf planet was thus established.  It would be named "[[plutoid]]" and more narrowly defined by the IAU Executive Committee on 11 June 2008.
* ''Resolution 6B'' sought to insert an additional sentence at the end of the statement in 6A: "This category is to be called 'plutonian objects'."  There was no debate on the question, and in the vote the proposed name was defeated by 186–183; a proposal to conduct a re-vote was rejected.  An IAU process was then to be put in motion to determine the name for the new category.<ref name=IAU0603/>
 
On a literal reading of the Resolution, "dwarf planets" are by implication of paragraph (1) excluded from the status of "planet".  Use of the word ''planet'' in their title may, however, cause some ambiguity.
 
== Final definition ==
The final definition, as passed on 24 August 2006 under the Resolution 5A of the 26th General Assembly, is:<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.iau.org/static/resolutions/Resolution_GA26-5-6.pdf|title=IAU 2006 General Assembly: Resolutions 5 and 6|date=2006-08-24|publisher=IAU}}</ref><ref>{{cite press release| title = IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU Resolution votes| url=http://www.iau.org/news/pressreleases/detail/iau0603/ | publisher= IAU (News Release – IAU0603) |date=August 24, 2006 |location=Prague |access-date=2008-08-04}}</ref>
 
{{cquote|[[File:The Planets Definition 3.svg|thumb|500px|right|Illustration of the outcome of the vote]]
The IAU...resolves that planets and other bodies, except satellites, in the [[Solar System]] be defined into three distinct categories in the following way:''
 
(1) A [[planet]] [1] is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a [[hydrostatic equilibrium]] (nearly round) shape, and (c) has [[cleared the neighbourhood]] around its orbit.
 
(2) A "[[dwarf planet]]" is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape [2], (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a [[Natural satellite|satellite]].
 
(3) All other objects [3], except satellites, orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as "[[Small Solar System body|Small Solar System Bodies]]".
 
Footnotes:
 
''[1] The [[Planet#Solar System|eight planets]] are: [[Mercury (planet)|Mercury]], [[Venus]], [[Earth]], [[Mars]], [[Jupiter]], [[Saturn]], [[Uranus]], and [[Neptune]].''<br />
''[2] An IAU process will be established to assign borderline objects into either dwarf planet and other categories.''<br />
''[3] These currently include most of the Solar System asteroids, most Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs), comets, and other small bodies.''}}
 
The IAU further resolves:
 
{{cquote|[[Pluto]] is a "dwarf planet" by the above definition and is recognized as the prototype of a new category of [[Trans-Neptunian Objects]][1].
 
Footnote:
 
''[1] An IAU process will be established to select a name for this category.''}}
 
The IAU also resolved that "''planets'' and ''dwarf planets'' are two distinct classes of objects", meaning that dwarf planets, despite their name, would not be considered planets.<ref name=IAU0603>{{cite press release
|date=2006-08-24
|publisher=International Astronomical Union (News Release – IAU0603)
|title=IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU Resolution votes
|url=http://www.iau.org/news/pressreleases/detail/iau0603/
|access-date=2007-12-31
}} ( [http://www.iau.org/iau0603.414.0.html orig link] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070103145836/http://www.iau.org/iau0603.414.0.html |date=2007-01-03 }})</ref>
 
== Closing issues ==
=== Substance ===
[[Alan Stern]], the lead scientist on [[New Horizons|NASA's robotic mission to Pluto]], contended that [[Earth]], [[Mars]], [[Jupiter]], and [[Neptune]] have not fully cleared their orbital zones, just like Pluto. Earth orbits with 10,000 [[near-Earth object|near-Earth asteroids]]. Jupiter, meanwhile, is accompanied by 100,000 Trojan asteroids on its orbital path. Stern has asserted: "If Neptune had cleared its zone, Pluto wouldn't be there."<ref name="plutovote">{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5283956.stm| title=Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt|publisher=BBC|access-date=2008-08-01|author=Paul Rincon|date=2006-08-25}}</ref>
 
Some astronomers counter this opinion by saying that, far from not having cleared their orbits, the major planets completely control the orbits of the other bodies within their orbital zone. Although Jupiter does coexist with a large number of small bodies in its orbit (the [[Trojan asteroid]]s), these bodies only exist in Jupiter's orbit because they are in the sway of the planet's huge gravity. Earth accretes or ejects near-Earth asteroids on million-year time scales, thereby clearing its orbit.  Similarly, Pluto may cross the orbit of Neptune, but Neptune long ago locked Pluto and its attendant Kuiper belt objects, called [[plutino]]s, into a 3:2 resonance (i.e., they orbit the Sun twice for every three Neptune orbits). Since the orbits of these objects are entirely dictated by Neptune's gravity, Neptune is therefore gravitationally dominant.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Eight Planets|author=Michael E. Brown|work=Caltech|url=http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/eightplanets/|date=2006| access-date=2007-02-21}}</ref>
 
On June 11, 2008, the IAU announced that the subcategory of dwarf planets with trans-Neptunian orbits would be known as "[[plutoid]]s". In an accompanying press release, the IAU said that:<ref>{{cite press release|date=2008-06-11|location=Paris|title=Plutoid chosen as name for Solar System objects like Pluto|publisher=International Astronomical Union (News Release – IAU0804)|url=http://www.iau.org/news/pressreleases/detail/iau0804/|access-date=2008-06-11}}</ref>
{{cquote|Plutoids are celestial bodies in orbit around the [[Sun]] at a distance greater than that of [[Neptune]] that have sufficient mass for their self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that they assume a [[hydrostatic equilibrium]] (near-spherical) shape, and that have not [[clearing the neighbourhood|cleared the neighbourhood]] around their orbit.}}
This subcategory includes [[Pluto]], [[Haumea (dwarf planet)|Haumea]], [[Makemake (dwarf planet)|Makemake]] and [[Eris (dwarf planet)|Eris]].
 
Some aspects of the definition are as yet difficult to apply outside the Solar System.  Techniques for identifying extrasolar objects generally cannot determine whether an object has "cleared its orbit", except indirectly via an [[Clearing the neighbourhood|orbit-clearing criterion]]. The wording of the 2006 definition is [[heliocentric]] in its use of the word ''[[Sun]]'' instead of ''[[star]] or [[Binary star|stars]]'', and is thus not applicable to the numerous [[Extra-solar planets|objects]] which have been identified in orbit around other stars. A separate "working" definition for extrasolar planets was, however, recommended by a working group of the IAU in 2003<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Definition of a planet|journal=Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union |volume=1 |pages=183–186 |bibcode=2007IAUTA..26..183B |doi=10.1017/S1743921306004509|year=2007 |last1=Boss |first1=Alan P |last2=Butler |first2=R. Paul |last3=Hubbard |first3=William B |last4=Ianna |first4=Philip A |last5=Kürster |first5=Martin |last6=Lissauer |first6=Jack J |last7=Mayor |first7=Michel |last8=Meech |first8=Karen J |last9=Mignard |first9=Francois |last10=Penny |first10=Alan J |last11=Quirrenbach |first11=Andreas |last12=Tarter |first12=Jill C |last13=Vidal-Madjar |first13=Alfred |doi-access=free }}</ref> and includes the criterion: "The minimum mass/size required for an extrasolar object to be considered a planet should be the same as that used in the Solar System."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/boss/definition.html |work=Working Group on Extrasolar Planets (IAU) |title=Position statement on the Definition of a "Planet" |access-date=2008-08-04 |date=2003-02-28 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060916161707/http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/boss/definition.html |archive-date=2006-09-16 }}</ref>
 
=== Process ===
The final vote was criticized because of the relatively small percentage of the 9000-strong IAU membership who participated. Besides the fact that most members do not attend the General Assemblies, this lack was also due to the timing of the vote: the final vote was taken on the last day of the 10-day event, after many participants had left or were preparing to leave. Many astronomers were also unable or chose not to make the trip to [[Prague]] and, thus, cast no vote. Only 424 astronomers were present for the vote, which is less than 5% of the astronomer community.<ref name="plutovote"/> However, sampling 400 representative members out of a population of 9,000 statistically yields a result with good accuracy (confidence interval better than 5%).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jlm/epo/planet/planet.html|author=Margot, Jean-Luc|title=What makes a planet?|date=2006|work=UCLA|access-date=2013-08-28}}</ref> Astronomer Marla Geha has clarified that not all members of the Union were needed to vote on the classification issue: only those whose work is directly related to planetary studies.<ref name="marlageha">{{cite web| url=http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060925/pluto| title=A Passion For Pluto| access-date=2006-09-13| publisher=thenation.com| archive-date=2006-11-30| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061130151204/http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060925/pluto| url-status=dead}}</ref>
 
== Impact ==
The decision generated cultural and societal implications, affecting the "industry of astronomical artifacts and toys."<ref name="NYT">{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/24/science/space/25pluto.html?_r=1&ei=5070&en=386a070cf318003c&ex=1156651200&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1156726801-q8exJblHyCMw948iShQaRw| title=Pluto is demoted to 'dwarf planet'| author=Dennis Overbye| work=[[The New York Times]]| date=2006-08-24| access-date=2006-08-27}}</ref> Most educational books that included the definition were printed after 2006. The decision was important enough to prompt the editors of the 2007 edition of the ''[[World Book Encyclopedia]]'' to hold off printing until a final result had been reached.<ref name="NYT"/>
 
=== Popular culture ===
The impact of the revised definition, particularly the change in the status of Pluto, has been reflected in popular culture.  A number of musical contributions have commemorated the change:
* "Planet X" (1996), song by [[Christine Lavin]]. A good-natured protest against suggestions that Pluto is not a planet.{{cn|date=August 2021}}
* "Pluto" (1998), song by [[2 Skinnee J's]]. An impassioned defense of Pluto's status as a planet.{{cn|date=August 2021}}
* ''Thing a Week'', August 25, 2006 podcast by [[Jonathan Coulton]]. Featured a song "I'm Your Moon", from Charon's point of view, about Pluto being reclassified as a dwarf planet.{{cn|date=August 2021}}
* "Bring Back Pluto" (2007), song by [[Aesop Rock]] on the album ''[[None Shall Pass]]''. Hip-hop song supporting Pluto's status as the 9th planet in the Solar System.{{cn|date=August 2021}}
* "Pluto" (2009), song by [[Robbie Fulks]], part of his release "50-vc. Doberman."  About Pluto's reclassification, remembered as a 9th planet from the times of the singer's youth, and re-presents Pluto as an unforgotten monarch of the [[Kuiper Belt]].{{citation needed|date=April 2017}}
* "Ode to Pluto" is the final track on [[Terra Lumina]]'s self-titled debut album, mentioning the change of classification.{{citation needed|date=April 2017}}
* Pluto's demotion is alluded to in "The Lonesome Friends of Science" on [[John Prine]]'s ''[[The Tree of Forgiveness]]'', in which the planets (including non-existent [[Vulcan (hypothetical planet)|Vulcan]]) are anthropomorphized, and Pluto is "uninvited to the interplanetary dance."{{cn|date=August 2021}}
* "134340" (2018), a song by [[BTS]] from album ''[[Love Yourself: Tear]]'', feature the breakup of a sad relationship by the Pluto status as a real planet.<ref>{{Cite web |date=September 3, 2018 |title=Korean Scientists Commend BTS For Integration Science On "134340" |url=https://www.hellokpop.com/kpop/korean-scientists-commend-bts-134340/ |url-status=live}}</ref>
 
===Plutoed===
The verb ''to pluto'' ([[preterite]] and [[participle|past participle]]: ''plutoed'') was [[neologism|coined]] in the aftermath of the 2006 IAU decision. In January 2007, the [[American Dialect Society]] chose ''plutoed'' as its 2006 [[Word of the Year]], defining ''to pluto'' as "to demote or devalue someone or something, as happened to the former planet Pluto when the General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union decided Pluto no longer met its definition of a planet."<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.americandialect.org/Word-of-the-Year_2006.pdf|title= "Plutoed" Voted 2006 Word of the Year| date=January 5, 2007| publisher=American Dialect Society| access-date=2007-01-07}}</ref><ref name="cnn">{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/07/word.of.the.year/index.html|title=Pluto's revenge: 'Word of the Year' award|access-date=2007-01-20|publisher=CNN|date=January 7, 2007}}</ref>
 
Society president Cleveland Evans stated the reason for the organization's selection of ''plutoed'': "Our members believe the great emotional reaction of the public to the demotion of Pluto shows the importance of Pluto as a name. We may no longer believe in the [[Pluto (mythology)|Roman god Pluto]], but we still have a sense of connection with the former planet".<ref name="msnbc">{{cite news|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/id/16529756|title='Plutoed' chosen as '06 Word of the Year|access-date=2007-01-10|agency=Associated Press|date=Jan 8, 2007}}</ref>
 
== See also ==
* [[Clearing the neighbourhood]]
* [[Fusor (astronomy)]]
* [[Geophysical planet definition]]
* [[List of Solar System objects]]
* [[List of former planets]]
* [[Minor planet]]
* [[Planet#Planetary-mass object|Planemo]]
* [[Small Solar System body]]
 
== References ==
{{Reflist|30em}}
 
== External links ==
{{wiktionary|pluto}}
{{Wikinews|Astronomers to vote on potential new planets | Pluto loses planet status}}
* [http://www.iau.org/news/pressreleases/detail/iau0603/ IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU Resolution votes] [[International Astronomical Union]] official site.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20081208140503/http://www.astronomy2006.com/media-stream-archive.php IAU 2006 General Assembly: video-records of the discussion and of the final vote on the Planet definition.]
* [http://www.iau.org/static/archives/releases/doc/iau0601_q_answers.doc Planet Definition Questions & Answers Sheet], International Astronomical Union Official Site
* [http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060816_planet_qanda.html Q&A: The IAU's Proposed Planet Definition] Q&A article on the new definition from SPACE.com
* [http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/eightplanets/ Dwarf planet discoverer Mike Brown explains the concept behind the new definition]
* [http://www.fisica.edu.uy/~gonzalo/Diario_de_la_Asamblea_IAU_2006.html Cronología de los hechos relativos a la Definición de Planeta adoptada por la Asamblea de la Unión Astronómica Internacional]
 
{{Solar System}}
{{Portal bar|Astronomy|Spaceflight|Outer space|Solar System}}
{{Good article}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:IAU Definition Of Planet}}
[[Category:2006 in science|Redefinition of planet]]
[[Category:Planets]]
[[Category:Dwarf planets]]
[[Category:History of astronomy]]
[[Category:Definition of planet]]
[[Category:Pluto's planethood]]
 
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):
 
IAU definition of planet (edit)
Template:About (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Blockquote (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Blockquote/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Bulleted list (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Template:Citation needed (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite conference (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite journal (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite magazine (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite news (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite press release (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite web (view source) (protected)
Template:Cn (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Cquote (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Delink (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Dp (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Dwarf planet link (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:E (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Earth's location in the Universe (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Evalns (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Fix (view source) (protected)
Template:Fix/category (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Good article (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Hlist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:If empty (view source) (protected)
Template:Large (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main other (view source) (protected)
Template:Minor planet (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Minor planet link abridged (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Mp (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Mpl- (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Navbox with columns (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Nowrap (view source) (protected)
Template:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Template:Plainlist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Portal-inline (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Portal bar (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Quote (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Reflist (view source) (protected)
Template:Reflist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:SDcat (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:SfnRef (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Short description (view source) (protected)
Template:Short description/lowercasecheck (view source) (protected)
Template:Side box (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Sister project (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Small (view source) (protected)
Template:Smaller (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Solar System (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Solar System navmap 2 (edit)
Template:Top icon (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Val (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Valid (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Webarchive (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Wikinews (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Wiktionary (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:X10^ (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:About (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/blacklist (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/shared (view source) (protected)
Module:Check for unknown parameters (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1 (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Convert (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Convert/data (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Convert/text (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Delink (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Footnotes (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Format link (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Gapnum (view source) (extended confirmed protected)
Module:Hatnote (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Hatnote/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Hatnote list (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:If empty (view source) (protected)
Module:List (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Navbox/configuration (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Navbox/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Portal (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal-inline (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/images/a (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/images/aliases (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/images/e (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/images/o (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal/images/s (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal bar (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Portal bar/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:SDcat (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Side box (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Side box/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:String (view source) (protected)
Module:TableTools (view source) (protected)
Module:Unsubst (view source) (protected)
Module:Val (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Val/units (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Webarchive (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Webarchive/data (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)
Return to IAU definition of planet.
 
Privacy policyAbout WikipediaDisclaimersContact WikipediaCode of ConductMobile viewDevelopersStatisticsCookie statementWikimedia FoundationPowered by MediaWiki
Search
View source for IAU definition of planet
Talk
View history
Watch
Edit source
 
Add languages
 
Personal tools

Latest revision as of 13:24, 24 August 2023

Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Wikipedia has more information on this subject:

For articles with a Wikipedia counterpart.