User talk:Sparkthedarkness: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(→File:ARMS LolaPop.png: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I don't really think those are necessary and could easily be integrated into the Appearance and Gallery sections. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 23:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC) | I don't really think those are necessary and could easily be integrated into the Appearance and Gallery sections. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 23:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
thanks for your concerns and I'll move them into the gallery section on the post with them [[User:Sparkthedarkness|sparkthedarkness]] {[[User Talk:Sparkthedarkness|chat]]} | thanks for your concerns and I'll move them into the gallery section on the post with them [[User:Sparkthedarkness|sparkthedarkness]] {[[User Talk:Sparkthedarkness|chat]]} | ||
== [[:File:ARMS LolaPop.png]] == | |||
While I think there could be some use for the full version of this image, I don't think it fits well in the infobox; the image in it should typically depict official renders. I do appreciate the effort to include transparency, but I don't think that particular image is preferable over the version 3 artwork. [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]] ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|talk]]) 07:53, 23 August 2017 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:53, 23 August 2017
Talk to sparkthedarkness
If you'd like to talk to me just edit this and let me know what you think of my updates to pages, thanks for checking out my talk page :3
Fan section
I don't really think those are necessary and could easily be integrated into the Appearance and Gallery sections. Nyargleblargle (talk) 23:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC) thanks for your concerns and I'll move them into the gallery section on the post with them sparkthedarkness {chat}
While I think there could be some use for the full version of this image, I don't think it fits well in the infobox; the image in it should typically depict official renders. I do appreciate the effort to include transparency, but I don't think that particular image is preferable over the version 3 artwork. Nyargleblargle (talk) 07:53, 23 August 2017 (EDT)